warn with voice

so , i was making a traffic light day , and i said to all ts , get to the goal line... and NOONE dit it , i repeated and warned them with my voice like 10 times and they didnt do it... then i killed a few, and vdou slayed me for freekill , but i thought we were allowed to WARN with VOICE?


btw , vdou slays me every time i kill him(because he doesn't like me...) isnt this abuse? :s

i got slayed TWICE IN A ROW BY VDOU im getting sick of it , he even admits he doesnt like me, does this person even deserve to be a member?

It's actually preferred to warn with voice! Based on the above I'd say you did nothing wrong at all.

QuickSilver wrote:It's actually preferred to warn with voice! Based on the above I'd say you did nothing wrong at all.

thats what i told him... and then i got kicked for whining to , i get kicked alot for nothing lately lol.

I didnt kick you red phoenix, a vip did.. and i kicked him for kicking u.. so stop whining..
and i slain u the first time because it wasnt a game, and wasnt simon says.. and u killed 2 ts with no warningshot.. and by saying trough ur microphone ''i can kill all now'' is not a warning..

The secound time, i slain u for killing me at the simon says command: simon says jump.
i jumped once, and u killed me.
U didnt say keep on jumping..

So just end this arguement phoenix.. it will get u nowhere

vDou wrote:and by saying trough ur microphone ''i can kill all now'' is not a warning..

If that's true, you did fail Phoenix.. It's not that hard to tell them a few times to get back or get in the pool or w/e.
What vDou wrote above is hardly a warning.

QuickSilver wrote:

vDou wrote:and by saying trough ur microphone ''i can kill all now'' is not a warning..

If that's true, you did fail Phoenix.. It's not that hard to tell them a few times to get back or get in the pool or w/e.
What vDou wrote above is hardly a warning.

as it is not true, i asked them 5-10 times to get to the line, i warned 3 times with voice...

vdou , i can get you a screenshot where you say , "warning with voice is not good , you have to warnshoot"

Yes, u have to warnshot if its not a game or simon says.. but u just instantly kills.. and i dont belive that saying u can kill everyone is a warning..
and by saying.. ''go to the line now'' can also be a trick..
But.. now.. where is all ur proof of all this? if u dont have any proof, this is going nowhere..
end of convesation red phoenix.. i hate arguements

vDou wrote:Yes, u have to warnshot if its not a game or simon says.. but u just instantly kills.. and i dont belive that saying u can kill everyone is a warning..
and by saying.. ''go to the line now'' can also be a trick..
But.. now.. where is all ur proof of all this? if u dont have any proof, this is going nowhere..
end of convesation red phoenix.. i hate arguements

nothing ends , as i warned with voice , and ofcourse i have no proofs about it... why would i record myself when im warning with voice? hm?

vdou , i will search in my logs where you said i had to warnshoot and not to warn with voice

vDou wrote:Yes, u have to warnshot if its not a game or simon says.. but u just instantly kills.. and i dont belive that saying u can kill everyone is a warning..

This is where you are wrong.
The rules clearly say: If Terrorists disobey commands after a phew warnings you are allowed to kill them.
It is not specified if this is a warning by voice or a warning by shooting.

Much like when you tell everyone to go to the cage, you count down from 5 to 0, then u give them a another warning by giving them another 3 seconds, counting down, you are allowed to kill anyone that is not heading towards the cage after that.

Warning 1: The command to go to the cage with no detours and no delays
Warning 2: The countdown
Warning 3: The 2nd countdown
Warning 4: bullet in the head

It doesn't have to be countdowns either. The entire jailbreak server seems to be high on countdowns atm. Like with simon says everyone DEMANDS a countdown, this is not needed. You are to follow a command in a reasonable amount of time wether it is counted down or not. Countdowns just make it easyer.

Come on start thinking
You dont have to warnshot every single Terrorist. If they dont obey to 1 or 2 mic warnings boom boom headshot
The warning shot thingy has no reason if people are talking through mic
just a little bit offtopic: vDou you said that he had no proofs so this is going owhere. What does it mean? Was it or not true? We dont need proofs to discuss such thing. And dont say you hate arguments. Listen to other people`s opinion because no one knows everything

This is what it should be with voice (if command is crouch i guess?)
Warning with voice:
Player Name stop running last chance

And yes it is hard to remember players names who you warned so just kill them usually

vDou wrote:i hate arguements

That's one of the most important task for a member...

A warning could be given by a warnshot or a warning through the mic, but ofcourse the one through the mic is prefered.

I'm not going to write everything down, since Marksel already did =)

Marksel FFS stop writing "phew" its "few" lol

and The Name of the thread is "warning in mic" so, i wanna ask:-

If a T is following a CT, who DOESNT have a Mic. and the CT Shoots the T in the foot. or Head. is that Allowed???

Coz lets say its Freeday and T's are allowed to follow, and in the rules it says CT Are allowed to Warn / Kill T's if he feels Threatened... BUT a lot of people (including me) say U Have to Warn Through Mic FIRST.. then u can Dish out Warning Shots.

Some1 explain

LTUMax JB wrote:Marksel FFS stop writing "phew" its "few" lol

and The Name of the thread is "warning in mic" so, i wanna ask:-

If a T is following a CT, who DOESNT have a Mic. and the CT Shoots the T in the foot. or Head. is that Allowed???

Coz lets say its Freeday and T's are allowed to follow, and in the rules it says CT Are allowed to Warn / Kill T's if he feels Threatened... BUT a lot of people (including me) say U Have to Warn Through Mic FIRST.. then u can Dish out Warning Shots.

Some1 explain

Warnings in that case, have to be delivered through a microphone before it gets physical.
That's why it is a clear advantage to have a microphone as CT.

If a CT has no mic, then his/her options are limited. In that case, when the CT feel really threatened, a single warn shot in the foot (not hs ofc!!) can be done. But that's also where East's reply comes in:

East Clubber wrote:That's why it is a clear advantage to have a microphone as CT.