when no member is online....
+2
qualiTY.
Hibari
6 posters
neonDragon.net :: UNBANS AND BANS :: [Jail] Bans :: Trash
Page 1 of 1
when no member is online....
#13 ".#Monkey D. Ruffy*" 194 STEAM_0:0:11892002 3 08:16 46 0
#11 "Robert" 173 STEAM_0:0:3769715 8 24:20 145
# 4 "wtpa" 116 STEAM_0:0:5283580 10 1:07:58 31
# 1 "ZEH GENERAL" 160 STEAM_0:0:2166049 9 27:00 25 0
#11 "Robert" 173 STEAM_0:0:3769715 8 24:20 145
# 4 "wtpa" 116 STEAM_0:0:5283580 10 1:07:58 31
# 1 "ZEH GENERAL" 160 STEAM_0:0:2166049 9 27:00 25 0
Hibari- Number of posts : 2048
Age : 30
Birthday : 1994-07-01
Location : Sweden
Registration date : 2009-08-11
Re: when no member is online....
Sorry for beeing off-topic, but how do you get the pictures so right :O?
qualiTY.- Number of posts : 7
Age : 33
Birthday : 1991-11-10
Location : alone@home
Job/hobbies : student, gym n' bisycle
Registration date : 2009-11-20
Re: when no member is online....
omfg Pixel mode 4x4 pixels
BBQQ- Number of posts : 125
Age : 33
Birthday : 1991-02-06
Registration date : 2009-07-23
Re: when no member is online....
I know monkey..
But he just did with no reason?
I mean there is no story? like he sayd fuck you and we started TK each other?
But he just did with no reason?
I mean there is no story? like he sayd fuck you and we started TK each other?
Mizurri- nD* Fun Member
- Number of posts : 5130
Age : 2018
Birthday : 2006-06-06
Location : Hell
Job/hobbies : Fulltime Gangster
Registration date : 2009-08-24
Re: when no member is online....
Monkey D. Ruffy*"
First screenshot:
look at the chat, obviously a provoked, TK, worth no more than a slay
Second screenshot:
Could have been a start of a global simon says day before the cells open and the T that got killed didn't follow the commands, no real proof (try demoing next time)
Third screenshot:
venting, fair enough it is against the rule, not really worth a strike though, but it does contribute to it on the other hand if there is enough of other violations.
overall: not worth a strike because of insignificant proof
Robert:
First screenshot:
Fairly good proof, there is no record of the other guy attacking him first or anything alike, then again it is not possible to see the conditions of the kill, so not very valuable
Second screenshot:
Obvious teamkill at start of the round (if you look at round time), maybe you gave him a reason the round before to do that? If not (which we can't know) this would be proof, you on the other hand do have a record of provoking teamkills by teamattacking alot.
Overal: not enough proof
wtpa:
First screenshot:
look at the chat, an obvious provoked teamkill (not worth more than a slay)
Second screenshot:
another series of provoked teamkills
Third screenshot:
yet another provoked teamkill
overal: far from enough proof
ZEH GENERAL:
First screenshot: obvious teamkill upon spawn (look at roundtime), something happened round before? alike all the other screenshots, impossible to know the conditions of the kill.
overal: not enough proof
This would be a perfect catch if you would have demo'd for like 5min, since all the incidents seem to have happened shortly after eachother.
First screenshot:
look at the chat, obviously a provoked, TK, worth no more than a slay
Second screenshot:
Could have been a start of a global simon says day before the cells open and the T that got killed didn't follow the commands, no real proof (try demoing next time)
Third screenshot:
venting, fair enough it is against the rule, not really worth a strike though, but it does contribute to it on the other hand if there is enough of other violations.
overall: not worth a strike because of insignificant proof
Robert:
First screenshot:
Fairly good proof, there is no record of the other guy attacking him first or anything alike, then again it is not possible to see the conditions of the kill, so not very valuable
Second screenshot:
Obvious teamkill at start of the round (if you look at round time), maybe you gave him a reason the round before to do that? If not (which we can't know) this would be proof, you on the other hand do have a record of provoking teamkills by teamattacking alot.
Overal: not enough proof
wtpa:
First screenshot:
look at the chat, an obvious provoked teamkill (not worth more than a slay)
Second screenshot:
another series of provoked teamkills
Third screenshot:
yet another provoked teamkill
overal: far from enough proof
ZEH GENERAL:
First screenshot: obvious teamkill upon spawn (look at roundtime), something happened round before? alike all the other screenshots, impossible to know the conditions of the kill.
overal: not enough proof
This would be a perfect catch if you would have demo'd for like 5min, since all the incidents seem to have happened shortly after eachother.
Marksel- nD* Runner Member
- Number of posts : 3979
Age : 32
Birthday : 1992-02-01
Location : Holland
Job/hobbies : Owning you!
Registration date : 2009-08-19
Re: when no member is online....
Accepted.
.#Monkey D. Ruffy*" 194 STEAM_0:0:11892002 - strike 1
-intering vent
-Teamkilling.
Robert" 173 STEAM_0:0:3769715 - strike 1
-Teamkilling
wtpa STEAM_0:0:5283580 - strike 1
-Teamkilling
Good profs.
Btw. Marksel. Teamkilling is a strike if there are no members to take care of it and as u can see on some of the screenshots cts is getting killed at spawn, and u can see on the timer that the round just started. And some of them do more than 1 teamkill.
.#Monkey D. Ruffy*" 194 STEAM_0:0:11892002 - strike 1
-intering vent
-Teamkilling.
Robert" 173 STEAM_0:0:3769715 - strike 1
-Teamkilling
wtpa STEAM_0:0:5283580 - strike 1
-Teamkilling
Good profs.
Btw. Marksel. Teamkilling is a strike if there are no members to take care of it and as u can see on some of the screenshots cts is getting killed at spawn, and u can see on the timer that the round just started. And some of them do more than 1 teamkill.
Pukata- Admin
- Number of posts : 1872
Age : 31
Birthday : 1993-07-21
Location : Denmark
Registration date : 2009-02-21
neonDragon.net :: UNBANS AND BANS :: [Jail] Bans :: Trash
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum