Rule change

When we escaped and won a /lr : CTS can kill us.
That need to change ! If we won a lr by escaping... we won the /lr. It's all.

What the point of escaping then?

True words

The point of escaping is to rebel, not to earn a last request.

Like I said in the last sentence: you need to earn a last request from the CT's, to do so you need to be a T that listens to what the CT tells you to do.

Why would a guard give you a last request if you escaped jail and killed his co-workers?

Marksel wrote:The point of escaping is to rebel, not to earn a last request.

Like I said in the last sentence: you need to earn a last request from the CT's, to do so you need to be a T that listens to what the CT tells you to do.

Why would a guard give you a last request if you escaped jail and killed his co-workers?

Couldn't agree more.

SultaN wrote:

Marksel wrote:The point of escaping is to rebel, not to earn a last request.

Like I said in the last sentence: you need to earn a last request from the CT's, to do so you need to be a T that listens to what the CT tells you to do.

Why would a guard give you a last request if you escaped jail and killed his co-workers?

Couldn't agree more.

I agree aswell.
If an escaper is the last T alive (for whatever reason), he will get shot for not having participated in the games that the others did have to do to get their /lr. It's been this way since ages and I don't really see a good reason to change it.

With escaping, you know knowfully take the risk that you will be shot and killed. Escaping is about rebelling and killing CTs, not to get /lr (like Mark said).

QuickSilver wrote:

SultaN wrote:

Marksel wrote:The point of escaping is to rebel, not to earn a last request.

Like I said in the last sentence: you need to earn a last request from the CT's, to do so you need to be a T that listens to what the CT tells you to do.

Why would a guard give you a last request if you escaped jail and killed his co-workers?

Couldn't agree more.

I agree aswell.
If an escaper is the last T alive (for whatever reason), he will get shot for not having participated in the games that the others did have to do to get their /lr. It's been this way since ages and I don't really see a good reason to change it.


With escaping, you know knowfully take the risk that you will be shot and killed. Escaping is about rebelling and killing CTs, not to get /lr (like Mark said).

QFT

It's true, but if we win a lr, we win a lr.

That doesn't make sense what so ever Koyumu, you don't win a lr, you earn one.

Marksel wrote:The point of escaping is to rebel, not to earn a last request.

Like I said in the last sentence: you need to earn a last request from the CT's, to do so you need to be a T that listens to what the CT tells you to do.

Why would a guard give you a last request if you escaped jail and killed his co-workers?

I agree with Mark it should be earned.
With this the escaping t's will just find a good place to hide and sit there and camp untill they have there lr..

/care.. they will go Rambo anyway.

If you apply this rule people would only escape and go inside the vents. Jail would be a no-sense game...

With this rule every day would be HnS t's hiding and the last T alive gets lr..

I agree whit whatever Marksel and Quicksilver said.. Altough (look down)

Red-Phoenix wrote:/care.. they will go Rambo anyway.

If the T is not a retard then he would probably go Rambo so what to do then? You can't do anything then besides slaying him, but that is to strict I believe.

Ancient wrote:I agree whit whatever Marksel and Quicksilver said.. Altough (look down)

Red-Phoenix wrote:/care.. they will go Rambo anyway.

If the T is not a retard then he would probably go Rambo so what to do then? You can't do anything then besides slaying him, but that is to strict I believe.

Why slay if that Terrorist didn't do anything wrong (rebeling is not breaking rules). That Terrorist can choose the /lr he wants, but for sure he knows CT Team will kill him.

Necro wrote:

Ancient wrote:I agree whit whatever Marksel and Quicksilver said.. Altough (look down)

Red-Phoenix wrote:/care.. they will go Rambo anyway.

If the T is not a retard then he would probably go Rambo so what to do then? You can't do anything then besides slaying him, but that is to strict I believe.

Why slay if that Terrorist didn't do anything wrong (rebeling is not breaking rules). That Terrorist can choose the /lr he wants, but for sure he knows CT Team will kill him.

I didn't say that you NEED to slay him. Read my last sentence : It's to strict to just slay him.
So using rambo is the only way to get out for the T.

Why are you giving them what the only escape way Ancient.. -.-

Ancient wrote:I didn't say that you NEED to slay him. Read my last sentence : It's to strict to just slay him.
So using rambo is the only way to get out for the T.

I know what you said, but I'd never do that. It's terriblely strict!

QuickSilver wrote:Why are you giving them what the only escape way Ancient.. -.-

I didn't get that sentence.

Ancient wrote:

QuickSilver wrote:Why are you giving them what the only escape way Ancient.. -.-

I didn't get that sentence.

He means that you shouldn't have mentioned the rambo option, because now more people will try to get /lr when rebelling and use rambo

Marksel wrote:

Ancient wrote:

QuickSilver wrote:Why are you giving them what the only escape way Ancient.. -.-

I didn't get that sentence.

He means that you shouldn't have mentioned the rambo option, because now more people will try to get /lr when rebelling and use rambo

^

Ah.. well if people know that they will be killed when they show up then there is no other option then rambo? You need to have some common sence and I don't think I have told a 'way' because most people know this already.

Marksel and QS said everything.